Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
SCHUTZ v. STATE OF TEXAS, 1933-99
Under Rule of Appellate Procedure 44.2(b), the appellate court must determine whether the trial court's error "harmed" the defendant after proper review of the record, and neither the defendant nor the state has the burden of proof to demonstrate resulting harm.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/19/2001
- Published 12/19/2001
Judges
- KELLER, Presiding Judge, delivered the opinion of the Court, joined by MEYERS, WOMACK, KEASLER, HERVEY, and COCHRAN, JJ.
Court
- Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Frank Blazek, Huntsville, for appellant., David P. Weeks, DA, Kay Douglas, Assist. DA, Huntsville, for state.