In an action challenging certain administrative orders of the Chief Administrative Judge of the State of New York (CAJ), dated January 8, 2004 and December 22, 2004, which petitioners claim denied them continuous service credit towards longevity increments for time worked in their former title: 1) petitioners' challenge to the January 2004 order, which eliminated the distinctions between officers in lower courts and superior courts, merged the titles of Court Officer and Senior Court Officer into the new title of NYS Court Officer, and created a new entry-level position is time-barred; but 2) because the record contains no explanation or rationale for the retroactive application of the December 2004 order, petitioners have demonstrated their entitlement to the relief sought as to that order.