Court of Appeals of New York

Defendant failed to preserve his claim that he did not receive 20 days notice prior to his sex offender designation proceeding as required under Correction Law section 168-n (3), and defendant's argument that an adjournment of unspecified duration was required as a matter of due process is similarly unreviewable.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/27/2013
• Published 08/27/2013

Judges

Court

• Court of Appeals of New York

Counsel