Court of Appeals of New York
Bloomer v. Shauger, 79
The Appellate Division correctly held that a vicious propensity cannot consist of "behavior that is normal or typical for the particular type of animal in question," and plaintiff failed to make such a showing with respect to the horse's behavior here.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/02/2013
- Published 05/02/2013
Judges
Court
- Court of Appeals of New York