Skip to main content

Court of Appeals of New York


Bloomer v. Shauger, 79

The Appellate Division correctly held that a vicious propensity cannot consist of "behavior that is normal or typical for the particular type of animal in question," and plaintiff failed to make such a showing with respect to the horse's behavior here.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/02/2013
  • Published 05/02/2013

Judges

Court

  • Court of Appeals of New York

Counsel

Copied to clipboard