Court of Appeals of New York
IRB-Brasil Resseguros v. Inepar Investments, 191
In a dispute between two Brazilian corporations for failure to pay on a note and accrued interest, the Appellate Division's that a choice-of-law clause in the parties' agreement denoting that New York law governs the parties' rights and obligations shall be given mandatory effect under General Obligations Law is affirmed and the need for a conflict-of-laws analysis is obviated by the terms of the parties' agreement.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/18/2012
- Published 12/18/2012
Judges
- Lippman
Court
- Court of Appeals of New York