Court of Appeals of New York

Defendant's right of confrontation was not violated by the admission into evidence of a statement made by his girlfriend, who was bleeding profusely and limping, in response to a question from a police officer, where the officer's evident reason for asking the question was to deal with an emergency, and the girlfriend was unavailable at trial.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/19/2006
• Published 12/19/2006

Judges

Court

• Court of Appeals of New York

Counsel