Court of Appeals of New York

Conviction for grand larceny is affirmed where defendant filed to preserve his challenged to the sufficiency of the evidence, and over claims that: 1) the trial court's evidentiary ruling violated his constitutional rights to a fair trial and to present a defense; and 2) that the Appellate Division's reliance on People v Gaimari (176 NY 84 [1903]) indicates that the court utilized an erroneous rule of law in rejecting his contention that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/21/2006
• Published 11/21/2006

Judges

Court

• Court of Appeals of New York

Counsel