Court of Appeals of New York
SHUMSKY v. EISENSTEIN, 2 No. 64
The continuous representation doctrine, when applied to a legal malpractice action, does not automatically come to an end where the retainer agreement between client and attorney explicitly anticipates continued representation.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/10/2001
- Published 05/10/2001
Judges
Court
- Court of Appeals of New York