Supreme Court of Illinois

In a conviction for driving with a blood-alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more and of driving under the influence of alcohol, appeal is dismissed for lack of an appropriate record on which to resolve the appeal where defendant sought review of the question whether a defendant is entitled to a Frye hearing to determine whether HGN test results are admissible as evidence of driving under the influence, but defendant failed to argue the HGN issue in his brief.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/22/2006
• Published 06/22/2006

Judges

• Justice GARMAN delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion:

Court

• Supreme Court of Illinois

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Michael J. Pelletier, Deputy Defender, Ann C. McCallister and Andrea Montavon-McKillip, Assistant Appellate Defenders, Office of State Appellate Defender, Chicago, for appellant., Lisa Madigan, Attorney General, Springfield, Richard A. Devine, State's Attorney, Chicago (Linda D. Woloshin, Assistant Attorney General, Chicago, James E. Fitzgerald, Alan J. Spellberg and Mary P. Needham, Assistant State's Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.