Supreme Court of Florida

In a prosecution of defendant for grand theft in one county, involving a later conviction for several unrelated charges in another county, the Fourth District's determination that defendant was not entitled to additional credit because the first county's sentence was consecutive to the second county's sentences, is affirmed as a defendant is not entitled to presentence jail-time credit on both sentences if the sentence for the unrelated charge is to be served consecutively.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/07/2010
• Published 10/07/2010

Judges

• Per Curiam

Court

• Supreme Court of Florida

Counsel