Supreme Court of Florida
Canseco v. State of Florida, SC09-1535
In petitioner's motion for postconviction relief, claiming that his nolo contendre plea in 1995 to possession of a controlled substance was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered because the possibility of deportation was not explained, judgment of the district court is affirmed as, a defendant may not obtain the benefit of a new two-year window period under State v. Green, if the claimant received actual notice of a deportation proceeding more than two years before the motion to withdraw plea.
Appellate Information
- Decided 04/22/2010
- Published 04/22/2010
Judges
- PER CURIAM.
Court
- Supreme Court of Florida
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner.
- For Appellees:
- Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, and Joshua R. Heller, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.