Supreme Court of Florida

Two judgments validating tax-increment-financed bonds proposed for issuance by a town are affirmed where: 1) the town was not required to conduct two readings of its proposed redevelopment resolutions; and 2) the proposed bonds were not a pledge of the town's taxing power and so were not subject to the referendum requirement.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/18/2008
• Published 09/18/2008

Judges

• PER CURIAM.

Court

• Supreme Court of Florida

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Terrell K. Arline, Bay County Attorney, Panama City, Florida, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Mark G. Lawson, Theresa B. Proctor, Christopher B. Roe, and Frederick J. Springer of Bryant Miller Olive, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida, Michael S. Davis of Bryant Miller Olive, P.A., Tampa, Florida, and Michael S. Burke of Burke, Blue, Hutchinson, Walters, and Smith, P.A., Panama City, Florida;  and William A. Lewis, Chief Assistant State Attorney, Fourteenth Judicial Circuit, Panama City, Florida, for Appellees.