Supreme Court of Florida
Brooks v. State of Florida, SC06-1266
The stricter could-have-been-imposed harmless error test, as opposed to the would-have-been-imposed test, applies to claims of sentencing error raised by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motions.
Appellate Information
- Decided 10/25/2007
- Published 10/25/2007
Judges
- CANTERO, J.
Court
- Supreme Court of Florida
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Isaac Ramon Ruiz-Carus, Tampa, FL, for Petitioner.
- For Appellees:
- Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL; and Celia Terenzio, Bureau Chief, and Laura Fisher Zibura, Assistant Attorneys General, West Palm Beach, FL, for Respondent.