Skip to main content

Supreme Court of Florida


Van Poyck v. State of Florida, SC05-1513

In a death penalty case, denial of a successive motion for postconviction relief, which raised a claim that an affidavit by a prison acquaintance of a codefendant constituted newly discovered evidence, is affirmed based on decisions in previous appeals rejecting related claims concerning the identity of a triggerman, including a 2005 affirmance of a denial of DNA testing.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/03/2007
  • Published 05/03/2007

Judges

  • PER CURIAM.

Court

  • Supreme Court of Florida

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Mark Olive, Tallahassee, FL, Benjamin B. Brown of Quarles and Brady, LLP, Naples, FL, Jeffrey O. Davis and Lauri A. Rollings of Quarles and Brady, LLP, Wilwaukee, WI, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, Celia A Terenzio, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, FL, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard