Supreme Court of Florida
Pardo v. State of Florida, SC03-1966
In a death penalty case, an order denying defendant's motion for postconviction relief and a petition for a writ of habeas corpus are affirmed and denied, respectively, over claims of error regarding: 1) a denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of claims regarding inadequate expert mental health evaluations; 2) a denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of a claim that trial counsel was ineffective in waiving severance of counts; 3) a Brady claim; 4) ineffective assistance of counsel; and 5) denial of a proper direct appeal.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/29/2006
- Published 06/29/2006
Judges
- PER CURIAM.
Court
- Supreme Court of Florida
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Neal A. Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Leor Veleanu and Lucrecia R. Diaz, Assistant CCR Counsel-South, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Appellant/Petitioner.
- For Appellees:
- Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, and Sandra S. Jaggard, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, FL, for Appellee/Respondent.