Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Supreme Court of Florida


Pardo v. State of Florida, SC03-1966

In a death penalty case, an order denying defendant's motion for postconviction relief and a petition for a writ of habeas corpus are affirmed and denied, respectively, over claims of error regarding: 1) a denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of claims regarding inadequate expert mental health evaluations; 2) a denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of a claim that trial counsel was ineffective in waiving severance of counts; 3) a Brady claim; 4) ineffective assistance of counsel; and 5) denial of a proper direct appeal.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/29/2006
  • Published 06/29/2006

Judges

  • PER CURIAM.

Court

  • Supreme Court of Florida

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Neal A. Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Leor Veleanu and Lucrecia R. Diaz, Assistant CCR Counsel-South, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Appellant/Petitioner.

  • For Appellees:
  • Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, and Sandra S. Jaggard, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, FL, for Appellee/Respondent.
Copied to clipboard