District Court of Appeal of Florida

Judgment for defense in a medical malpractice suit containing attorney's fees and sanctions is affirmed where: 1) certain expert testimony was not a surprise, prejudicial, or a disruption of the trial; 2) photographs submitted by the defense were properly authenticated and relevant; and 3) the trial court did not improperly restrict an expert from commenting on the sufficiency or credibility of the opposing expert's evidence or testimony.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/31/2007
• Published 01/31/2007

Judges

Court

• District Court of Appeal of Florida

Counsel