District Court of Appeal of Florida

A juvenile's adjudication of delinquency for producing, directing or promoting a photograph or representation that she knew included sexual conduct of a child -- specifically, explicit digital photos of herself and her boyfriend, another juvenile -- is affirmed where: 1) there was a compelling state interest in preventing the production of the photographs, and criminal prosecution was the least intrusive means of furthering that interest; and 2) the privacy provision of the state constitution does not protect appellant's behavior.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/19/2007
• Published 01/22/2007

Judges

• WOLF, J.

Court

• District Court of Appeal of Florida

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and David P. Gauldin, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Giselle Lylen Rivera, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.