District Court of Appeal of Florida

In an appeal brought by a railroad company which sought to close a grade crossing used by appellee and appellee's tenants, the lower court judgment is affirmed where there was no abuse of discretion in the trial court's not requiring appellee to bear more of the cost of the liability risk associated with keeping the crossing open when the trial court decided the amount of compensation due appellant-servient landowner from appellee-dominant landowner for appellee-s statutory way-of-necessity.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/12/2006
• Published 12/13/2006

Judges

Court

• District Court of Appeal of Florida

Counsel