District Court of Appeal of Florida

In a dispute involving a former employee's right to benefits provided for in a city's pension plan, summary judgment for the city is affirmed where: 1) although the circuit court incorrectly interpreted the language, "employed on or after October 1, 1981," to exclude plaintiff; nevertheless, 2) it correctly found that plaintiff, as an appointed officer, was required to make a written request to be included in the plan.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/29/2006
• Published 11/29/2006

Judges

• WHATLEY, Judge.

Court

• District Court of Appeal of Florida

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Arnold D. Levine and Robert H. Mackenzie of Levine, Hirsch, Segall, Mackenzie & Friedsam, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Richard M. Zabak and Kelley A. Bosecker of GrayRobinson, Tampa, for Appellees.