Skip to main content

District Court of Appeal of Florida


Kusick v. Kusick, 2D05-1270, 2D05-3265

Denial of a supplemental petition for modification of alimony is affirmed where former husband failed to show a change in circumstances sufficient to warrant a modification of alimony. An order granting the former wife's motion for order of contempt is affirmed without comment but an award of attorney's fees is reversed where the order did not contain specific findings as to the reasonableness of the hourly rate or hours expended on the case.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/15/2006
  • Published 11/15/2006

Judges

  • MAYE, VIVIAN C., Associate Judge.

Court

  • District Court of Appeal of Florida

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Andrew J. Rodnite, Jr. of Reeser, Rodnite, Outten & Zdravko, P.A., Palm Harbor, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • M. Katherine Ramers of M. Katherine Ramers, P.A., Dunedin, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard