District Court of Appeal of Florida

In a dispute involving whether plaintiffs- monies were a loan or an investment in certain adult entertainment companies, summary judgments and judgments on the pleadings for various corporate defendants are affirmed where the trial court correctly found that: 1) corporate defendants were not part of an original oral agreement, and thus, were not liable on certain claims; and 2) civil theft claims were barred by unmet legal requisites.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/20/2006
• Published 09/20/2006

Judges

• MAY, J.

Court

• District Court of Appeal of Florida

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Ross Bennett Gampel of Law Offices of Klemick and Gampel, P.A., Miami, Carl H. Hoffman of Hoffman & Hertzig, P.A., Coral Gables, and Steven M. Goldsmith of Steven M. Goldsmith, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Charles L. Curtis, Fort Lauderdale, and Charles Pettit, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.