District Court of Appeal of Florida
Mitchell v. DiMare, 5D05-1691
A trial court ruling finding that plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, was not entitled to a commission in connection with a real property purchase contract he procured is affirmed where plaintiff was not entitled to a commission under a brokerage agreement since no binding contract existed between parties because a contract plainly provided that the contract would not become effective unless a right of first refusal was rejected.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/25/2006
- Published 08/25/2006
Judges
- ORFINGER, J.
Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Sean P. Sheppard, of Sheppard & Sheppard, P.A., St. Augustine, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Robert L. McLeod, II, of the McLeod Firm, St. Augustine, for Appellee.