Skip to main content

District Court of Appeal of Florida


State v. Pitts, 2D04-1202

A trial court's ruling suppressing certain statements made by defendant and denying suppression of others in a prosecution on double murder charges is reversed in part as to the suppression of statements made by defendant during certain interviews where: 1) defendant was not in custody during an extended interrogation that was conducted prior to his formal arrest; 2) defendant did not invoke his right to remain silent after he was read his Miranda rights; 3) defendant gave a voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights; and 4) Miranda warnings given to defendant were effective under Seibert.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/04/2006
  • Published 08/04/2006

Judges

  • CANADY, Judge.

Court

  • District Court of Appeal of Florida

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee., Robert A. Norgard, Bartow, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard