District Court of Appeal of Florida
Cardoza v. State of Florida, 2D05-1133
When a defendant appeals an order suppressing evidence obtained by search and seizure, such order does not have to be entered in writing in order for appellate jurisdiction to be vested in a district court. Defendant's convictions for possession of heroin, possession of cannabis, and possession of drug paraphernalia are affirmed over a claim of erroneous denial of a suppression motion.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/05/2006
- Published 05/05/2006
Judges
- VILLANTI, Judge.
Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Carol J.Y. Wilson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marilyn Muir Beccue, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.