Skip to main content

District Court of Appeal of Florida


Cardoza v. State of Florida, 2D05-1133

When a defendant appeals an order suppressing evidence obtained by search and seizure, such order does not have to be entered in writing in order for appellate jurisdiction to be vested in a district court. Defendant's convictions for possession of heroin, possession of cannabis, and possession of drug paraphernalia are affirmed over a claim of erroneous denial of a suppression motion.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/05/2006
  • Published 05/05/2006

Judges

  • VILLANTI, Judge.

Court

  • District Court of Appeal of Florida

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Carol J.Y. Wilson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marilyn Muir Beccue, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard