District Court of Appeal of Florida

A defense verdict arising from two separate automobile accidents that were tried together is affirmed where: 1) the trial court properly excluded certain testimony by plaintiff's reconstruction expert as speculative; 2) the verdict was not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence; and 3) piecemeal transcripts deprived the reviewing court of the ability to review the record as a whole.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/03/2006
• Published 05/03/2006

Judges

Court

• District Court of Appeal of Florida

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Paul Richard Bloomquist, Tampa, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Charles W. Hall and Mark D. Tinker of Fowler, White, Boggs & Banker, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellees Jennifer Lynn Mathie and James M. Mathie., Richard A. Sherman of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Susan Gasink Bateman and Brooks W. Bateman.