Skip to main content

District Court of Appeal of Florida


H.F. v. State, 3d05-1706

Conviction for petit theft is affirmed, but conviction for criminal mischief is reversed where the evidence was insufficient to show that the defendant intended to damage a mobile telephone as opposed to acting with malice towards the victim.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/26/2006
  • Published 04/26/2006

Judges

  • PER CURIAM., Before GERSTEN, RAMIREZ, and SHEPHERD, JJ.

Court

  • District Court of Appeal of Florida

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, and Raoul D. Garcia, and Eduardo P. Rivera, Certified Legal Interns, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and William J. Selinger, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard