District Court of Appeal of Florida

Denial of defendant's motion to dismiss insurance commissioner plaintiff's action to recover, as "voidable preferences," preferential payments made to defendants under a certain reinsurance agreement is affirmed where the trial court properly found plaintiff was not a party to the reinsurance agreement which included an arbitration clause.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/28/2005
• Published 12/28/2005

Judges

• HAZOURI, J.

Court

• District Court of Appeal of Florida

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Nicholas T. Christakos and Rich Massumi, of Counsel, of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan, LLP, Washington, D.C., and George E. Harris of George E. Harris, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Steven A. Lessne and Howard M. Camerik of Blank Rome, LLP, Boca Raton, for appellee.