Skip to main content

District Court of Appeal of Florida


Perrine v. State of Florida, 3D05-645, 3D04-2496

Denial of defendant's motion to suppress is affirmed where the trial court did not err in finding that a tainted post-Miranda interrogation had been dissipated since either a break in custody or a lapse of time may be sufficient to obviate the effect of improper police interrogation.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/08/2005
  • Published 12/08/2005

Judges

  • Before CORTIÑAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Court

  • District Court of Appeal of Florida

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Thomas Regnier, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General and Michele Samaroo, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard