District Court of Appeal of Florida
Perrine v. State of Florida, 3D05-645, 3D04-2496
Denial of defendant's motion to suppress is affirmed where the trial court did not err in finding that a tainted post-Miranda interrogation had been dissipated since either a break in custody or a lapse of time may be sufficient to obviate the effect of improper police interrogation.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/08/2005
- Published 12/08/2005
Judges
- Before CORTIÑAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Thomas Regnier, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General and Michele Samaroo, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.