Skip to main content

Supreme Court of Delaware


Dixon v. State of Delaware, 393, 2009

Defendant's convictions for Assault in the First Degree, Reckless Endangering in the First Degree, Possession of a Firearm During the Commission of a Felony, and Possession of a Deadly Weapon by a Person Prohibited are affirmed where: 1) a witness's statements in a 911 call were admissible as excited utterances under Del. R. Evid. 803(2); and 2) the admission of the 911 call into evidence did not violate defendant's rights under the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/24/2010
  • Published 05/24/2010

Judges

  • HOLLAND, Justice., Before HOLLAND, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices.

Court

  • Supreme Court of Delaware

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Nicole M. Walker, Esquire, Office of the Public Defender, Wilmington, Delaware, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • James T. Wakley, Esquire, Department of Justice, Wilmington, Delaware, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard