Supreme Court of Delaware

Reset A A Font size: Print

Dixon v. State of Delaware, 393, 2009

Defendant's convictions for Assault in the First Degree, Reckless Endangering in the First Degree, Possession of a Firearm During the Commission of a Felony, and Possession of a Deadly Weapon by a Person Prohibited are affirmed where: 1) a witness's statements in a 911 call were admissible as excited utterances under Del. R. Evid. 803(2); and 2) the admission of the 911 call into evidence did not violate defendant's rights under the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause.

Appellate Information

  • Submitted 03/31/2010
  • Decided 05/24/2010
  • Published 05/24/2010


  • HOLLAND, Justice., Before HOLLAND, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices.


  • Supreme Court of Delaware


  • For Appellant:
  • Nicole M. Walker, Esquire, Office of the Public Defender, Wilmington, Delaware, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • James T. Wakley, Esquire, Department of Justice, Wilmington, Delaware, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard