Supreme Court of Delaware
Betts v. State of Delaware, 256, 2009
Trial court judge's resentencing of defendant and entry of judgment finding that defendant failed to comply with the terms of his nolo contendere plea agreement and conditions of probation by refusing to discuss the underlying sexual offenses during probation counseling sessions is affirmed as, the trial court judge correctly concluded that defendant's failure to comply with his conditions of probation constituted a violation of that probation.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/03/2009
- Published 11/03/2009
Judges
Court
- Supreme Court of Delaware