Supreme Court of Delaware
Hudson v. State of Delaware, 429, 2007
Convictions on drug and firearms charges are affirmed over objections regarding a chief investigating officer's testimony as an expert witness, specifically that: 1) he should not have been allowed to testify as both a fact witness and an expert witness; 2) he was not qualified to be an expert witness, his expert testimony was not required, and he was inherently biased; and 3) the state should not have been allowed, during trial, to "educate" him about how to testify as an expert witness.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/15/2008
- Published 08/15/2008
Judges
- HOLLAND, Justice:, Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and JACOBS, Justices.
Court
- Supreme Court of Delaware
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Dean C. Johnson, Esquire, Assistant Public Defender, Georgetown, DE, for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Abby Adams, Esquire, Department of Justice, Georgetown, DE, for appellee.