Supreme Court of Delaware
Hoag v. Amex Ins. Co., 461, 2007
Dismissal of plaintiff's uninsured-motorist claim as a sanction for his failure to provide discovery as ordered by the trial court was neither too extreme nor an abuse of discretion where the failures were willful and repeated.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/21/2008
- Published 07/21/2008
Judges
- RIDGELY, Justice., Before HOLLAND, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices.
Court
- Supreme Court of Delaware
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Kenneth F. Carmine (argued), Esquire, of Potter, Carmine & Associates, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware for appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Stephen P. Casarino (argued), Esquire, of Casarino, Christman & Shalk, Wilmington, Delaware for appellee.