Supreme Court of Delaware

Reset A A Font size: Print

In the Matter of: Estep, 647, 2006

In proceedings involving a public accountant engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, the court approves the findings below and finds that the appropriate sanctions are disgorgement of fees earned by respondent after the prior entry of a Cease and Desist Order, and a $2000 fine for each of nine counts of an Amended Petition found to have constituted a contempt of the Cease and Desist Order.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/15/2007
  • Published 08/20/2007


  • PER CURIAM., Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND, BERGER, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices, constituting the Court en Banc.


  • Supreme Court of Delaware


  • For Appellant:
  • Patricia B. Schwartz, Esquire, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Wilmington, Delaware.

  • For Appellees:
  • William J. Rhodunda, Jr., Esquire, Oberly, Jennings & Rhodunda, Wilmington, Delaware, for the Respondent.
Copied to clipboard