Supreme Court of Delaware
Sullins v. State, 466-2006
Convictions and sentences for various drug charges are affirmed over defendant's claim that the superior court reversibly erred in: 1) denying his motion to dismiss the indictment on Double Jeopardy grounds after the superior court declared a mistrial; and 2) permitting the State to introduce testimony that defendant was under probation supervision at the time of his arrest.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/23/2007
- Published 07/23/2007
Judges
- JACOBS, Justice., Before, HOLLAND, BERGER and JACOBS, Justices.
Court
- Supreme Court of Delaware
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Jan A.T. van Amerongen, Jr., Esquire, Wilmington, Delaware for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Timothy J. Donovan, Jr., Esquire, Department of Justice, Wilmington, Delaware, for Appellee.