Seaford Golf & Country Club v. E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co., 530, 2006
In a dispute concerning whether certain property that a country club purchased and leased from duPont remained subject to a deed restriction and a right of first refusal running in duPont's favor, summary judgment for duPont is reversed and remanded where, the term "Plant," as used in the documents containing the restrictions, was not correctly determined as a matter of fact or law on the record.
- Decided 05/15/2007
- Published 05/21/2007
- JACOBS, Justice:, Before HOLLAND, BERGER and JACOBS, Justices.
- Supreme Court of Delaware
- For Appellant:
- David R. Hackett of Griffin & Hackett, P.A. Georgetown, DE, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Arthur L. Dent (argued) and Sarah E. DiLuzio of Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE, for Appellee.