Supreme Court of Delaware

Reset A A Font size: Print

Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc., 344, 2006

In a derivative action alleging breaches of controlling stockholder's and directors' fiduciary duties, dismissal of the action, on the basis that plaintiffs' counsel had been permitted to withdraw and they were unable to obtain new counsel under the conditions imposed by the trial court, is reversed where the trial court abused its discretion in requiring plaintiffs' new counsel to enter unconditional appearances that could not be withdrawn.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/09/2007
  • Published 05/09/2007

Judges

Court

  • Supreme Court of Delaware

Counsel

Copied to clipboard