Supreme Court of Delaware
Hicks v. State of Delaware, 360, 2005
A conviction for drug-related offenses is affirmed over claims that the superior court reversibly erred by: 1) denying defendant's motion for a new trial claiming newly discovered evidence; 2) excluding evidence of a prior crime committed by the state-s trial witness; and 3) denying defendant's request to impeach the state's expert.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/06/2006
- Published 12/06/2006
Judges
- JACOBS, Justice., Before STEELE, Chief Justice, BERGER and JACOBS, Justices.
Court
- Supreme Court of Delaware
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- John F. Brady, Esquire, of Brady, Richardson, Beauregard & Chasanov, Georgetown, Delaware; for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Kim Ayvazian, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, Department of Justice, Georgetown, Delaware; for Appellee.