Supreme Court of Delaware

In a negligence action arising out of an auto accident, judgment is affirmed where: 1) motion for a directed verdict was denied as internal inconsistencies in testimony prevented plaintiff from conclusively establishing causation; and 2) motion for new trial was denied as, based on the overall evidence presented at trial, a reasonable juror could find the injuries did not result from the accident.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/29/2006
• Published 10/03/2006

Judges

Court

• Supreme Court of Delaware

Counsel