Supreme Court of Delaware
Gentile v. Rosette, 573, 2005
Summary judgment for defendants, former directors and a CEO, on minority shareholders' claim of breach of fiduciary duty arising from a particular self-dealing transaction is reversed where the claim was not exclusively derivative and could be brought by the former minority shareholders directly.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/17/2006
- Published 08/21/2006
Judges
- JACOBS, Justice., Before HOLLAND, BERGER and JACOBS, Justices.
Court
- Supreme Court of Delaware
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- David A. Jenkins (argued), Joelle E. Polesky, Robert K. Beste, III, and Michele C. Gott, Esquires, of Smith, Katzenstein & Furlow LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; John L. Reed, Esquire, of Edwards & Angell Palmer & Dodge, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; for Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Jesse A. Finkelstein, Raymond J. DiCamillo and Michael R. Robinson, Esquires, of Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Of Counsel: Sean T. Carnathan (argued) and Alan J. Langton II, Esquires, of O'Connor, Carnathan and Mack LLC, Burlington, Massachusetts; for Appellees.