Supreme Court of Delaware

Reset A A Font size: Print

Kurzmann v. State of Delaware, 381, 2005

Defendant's sentence pursuant to a finding that he had violated his probation by assaulting his wife is affirmed over claims that: 1) the prosecutor engaged in egregious misconduct; 2) a judge sentenced him with a closed mind; 3) a judge should not have found a violation of probation when the state never charged him with a criminal offense arising out of the alleged assault; and 4) the judge impermissibly relied upon -medical testimony- from a non-expert witness.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/13/2006
  • Published 07/17/2006


  • STEELE, Chief Justice., Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and BERGER, Justices.


  • Supreme Court of Delaware


  • For Appellant:
  • Michael R. Abram, Law Office of Edward C. Gill, P.A., Georgetown, Delaware for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Kim Ayvazian, Department of Justice, Georgetown, Delaware for appellee.
Copied to clipboard