Supreme Court of Delaware

Defendant's sentence pursuant to a finding that he had violated his probation by assaulting his wife is affirmed over claims that: 1) the prosecutor engaged in egregious misconduct; 2) a judge sentenced him with a closed mind; 3) a judge should not have found a violation of probation when the state never charged him with a criminal offense arising out of the alleged assault; and 4) the judge impermissibly relied upon -medical testimony- from a non-expert witness.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/13/2006
• Published 07/17/2006

Judges

• STEELE, Chief Justice., Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and BERGER, Justices.

Court

• Supreme Court of Delaware

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Michael R. Abram, Law Office of Edward C. Gill, P.A., Georgetown, Delaware for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Kim Ayvazian, Department of Justice, Georgetown, Delaware for appellee.