THE DOVER HISTORICAL SOC'Y v. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMM'N, 440, 2003
In this zoning law case, plaintiffs have asserted an injury in fact and have demonstrated that their interest is within the zone of interests intended to be protected by the city and that their injury is fairly traceable to the defendant's conduct and can be redressed with the relief requested; accordingly, judgment of superior court is reversed.
- Decided 12/05/2003
- Published 12/05/2003
- HOLLAND, Justice:, Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and JACOBS, Justices.
- Supreme Court of Delaware
- For Appellant:
- Grover C. Brown and Michael J. Maimone, of Gordon, Fournaris & Mammarella, P.A., Wilmington, for appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Nicholas H. Rodriguez and William W. Pepper, Sr., of Schmittinger and Rodriguez, P.A., Dover, for appellee, City of Dover Planning Commission and its members., William E. Manning and Richard A. Forsten, of Klett, Rooney, Lieber & Schorling, Wilmington, for appellees, Young & Malmberg and Yozima, L.L.C.