Supreme Court of Delaware

The Superior Court erred 1) in ruling that an affidavit plaintiff filed in opposition to defendant's summary judgment motion was a sham and would not be considered, and in 2) concluding that the record did not establish a "product nexus" for an inference that plaintiff had been exposed to an asbestos-containing product.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/29/2003
• Published 10/02/2003

Judges

• JACOBS, Justice:, Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and JACOBS, Justices.

Court

• Supreme Court of Delaware

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• David A. Arndte, and Robert Jacobs, of Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A., Wilmington, DE, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• David L. Baumberger, of Chrissinger & Baumberger, Wilmington, DE, for Appellee.