WALTON v. STATE OF DELAWARE, 59, 2002
Defendant's conduct and statements about a bomb did not amount to evidence that he displayed "what appeared to be a deadly weapon" under the first degree robbery statute. A hearsay statement made by defendant to a psychiatrist was properly excluded.
- Decided 04/25/2003
- Published 04/30/2003
- VEASEY, Chief Justice, for the Majority., Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH, HOLLAND, BERGER and STEELE, Justices, constituting the Court en Banc.
- Supreme Court of Delaware
- For Appellant:
- Sandra W. Dean, Esquire, Office of the Public Defender, Dover, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- John Williams, Esquire, Department of Justice, Dover, for Appellee.