Supreme Court of Delaware

A motion to dismiss a portion of an appeal is denied where the appealing party filed a timely direct appeal after a court decision to maintain an extant confidentiality order, which constituted a subsequent separate final judgment.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/25/2002
• Published 12/05/2002

Judges

• HOLLAND, Justice., Before WALSH, HOLLAND and BERGER, Justices.

Court

• Supreme Court of Delaware

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Douglas L. Hallett, Esquire, in propria persona., Sheldon K. Rennie, Esquire, of Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien & Frankel, Wilmington, Delaware., James C. Strum, Esquire, of Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, Wilmington, Delaware., Kurt M. Heyman, Esquire, of The Bayard Firm, Wilmington, Delaware.


• For Appellees:
  
• Anne C. Foster, Esquire and Thad J. Bracegirdle, Esquire, of Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Delaware, for appellee.