Superior Court of Delaware

Defendant's sixth motion for postconviction relief from a conviction for robbery, conspiracy, and additional charges arising out of a series of robberies at supermarkets is denied over claims that the court has inconsistently applied the procedural bars of Rule 61(i) in previous cases, and that the state intentionally withheld allegedly favorable exculpatory evidence, namely the identities of certain police informants.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/02/2006
• Published 08/15/2006

Judges

Court

• Superior Court of Delaware

Counsel