Court of Chancery of Delaware
Gatz v. Ponsoldt, 174-N
In a case brought by a company's shareholders asserting they had a direct claim in connection with a certain "sham" transaction alleged to have taken place between two of the company's subsidiaries, defendants' motion to dismiss is granted since plaintiffs' claim was clearly derivative under Tooley.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/26/2006
- Published 06/12/2006
Judges
Court
- Court of Chancery of Delaware