Supreme Court of California
Miklosy v. Regents of the Univ. of California, S139133
The California Whistleblower Protection Act precludes a damages action against the University of California when the University of California has timely decided a retaliation complaint.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/31/2008
- Published 07/31/2008
Judges
- KENNARD, J.
Court
- Supreme Court of California
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Gwilliam, Ivary, Chiosso, Cavalli & Brewer, J. Gary Gwilliam, Oakland; Law Offices of Jan C. Nielsen and Jan C. Nielsen for Plaintiffs and Appellants., Loraine V. Johnson as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants., Kerr & Wagstaffe, Michael von Loewenfeldt, San Francisco, and Michael K. Ng for Project on Government Oversight as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants., Joel Golden, San Diego, for Dr. Larry M. Brand as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants., Ross, Dixon & Bell and Jon R. Williams for Whistlebusters.org as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants., Loulena Miles, Livermore, for Tri-Valley CAREs as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants., Beeson, Tayer & Bodine and Dale L. Brodsky, Oakland, for Society of Professionals, Scientists, and Engineers, Local 11 and University Professional and Technical Employees, CWA Local 9119, AFL-CIO as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Reed Smith, Paul D. Fogel, Dennis Peter Maio, San Francisco; Melissa M. Allain, Janet G. Tulk, Gabriela B. Odell, Max A. Creamer, Livermore; Jeffrey A. Blair, Oakland; Hanson Bridgett Marcus Vlahos & Rudy, Patrick M. Glenn, San Francisco, Sandra K. Rappaport and Sarah D. Mott, San Francisco, for Defendants and Respondents.