Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Supreme Court of California


People v. Crandell, S134883

Judgment in a criminal matter imposing a restitution fine of $2,600 that had not been mentioned by the prosecutor when he recited the parties' plea agreement is affirmed as, under the circumstances, it was clear that when defendant entered his plea, he could not reasonably have understood his negotiated disposition to signify that no substantial restitution fine would be imposed.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/30/2007
  • Published 04/30/2007

Judges

  • WERDEGAR, J.

Court

  • Supreme Court of California

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Jonathan Grossman, under appointment by the Supreme Court, Santa Clara, and Larry L. Dixon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Jackson, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer and Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorneys General, Manuel M. Medeiros, State Solicitor General, Donald E. De Nicola, Deputy State Solicitor General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Assistant Attorney General, Laurence K. Sullivan, René A. Chacón and David M. Baskind, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard