Supreme Court of California

Denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence with regard to charges of possession of methamphetamine for sale is affirmed where a "no-knock- entry by police to conduct a probation search into was justified by exigent circumstances and did not violate California's "knock-notice" rule.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/28/2005
• Published 11/29/2005

Judges

• CHIN, J.

Court

• Supreme Court of California

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Laurel Nelson Smith, under appointment by the Supreme Court, Cotopaxi, for Defendant and Appellant., Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Quisteen S. Shum, Steven T. Oetting and Heather F. Crawford, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.