Supreme Court of California

Reset A A Font size: Print

Le Francois v. Goel, S126630

Code of Civil Procedure sections 437c(f)(2) and 1008 prohibit a party from making renewed motions not based on new facts or law, but do not limit a court's ability to reconsider its previous interim orders on its own motion, as long as the parties have notice.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/09/2005
  • Published 06/09/2005


  • CHIN, J.


  • Supreme Court of California


  • For Appellant:
  • Robinson & Wood, Jon B. Zimmerman, Helen E. Williams and Joanna L. Mishler, San Jose, for Plaintiffs and Appellants., Thomas M. Eells as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Reed Smith, Paul D. Fogel, San Francisco;  Law Offices of Philip R. McCowan, Philip R. McCowan and John M. Ingle, for Defendants and Respondents., Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Raoul D. Kennedy, Davidson M. Pattiz, San Francisco, Douglas B. Adler, Los Angeles, and Seth M. Schwartz, Walnut Creek, for Citigroup, Inc., and Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.
Copied to clipboard